Visible thinking in higher education: reflection, feedback and student agency
- Naomi Rowan
- Dec 6, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: 18 hours ago
Practical writing on assessment, feedback, workflow redesign, digital change and AI in higher education.
Visible thinking is not just a classroom technique. It can help strengthen reflection, feedback, dialogue, and student agency across higher education.
Why I still find it useful
Some approaches stay with you because they are practical.
Visible thinking is one of those for me.
What I value about it is not the language around it, but what it helps people do. It helps make thought processes more visible. It creates space for reflection. It gives structure to dialogue. And it often slows people down just enough to think more clearly.
That is useful in teaching. It is useful in staff development. And it is often useful in institutional change.
In teaching and assessment

In higher education, students are often asked to produce finished work without much help in making their thinking visible along the way.
That matters because feedback becomes more useful when it has something to work with. Reflection becomes more meaningful when students can name what they are noticing, questioning, and changing. And student agency grows when learners are not only told what to improve, but can see more clearly how they are thinking.
Visible thinking approaches can support that.
They can help students:
reflect more deliberately
engage more actively with feedback
make links between ideas
question assumptions
develop stronger ownership of their learning
In staff development and change
I also find visible thinking useful beyond the classroom.
In staff development, it can help teams make assumptions visible, surface different interpretations, and have more thoughtful conversations about practice.
In change work, it can help people move away from vague positions and toward clearer shared understanding. That matters when the work is complex - especially in areas like assessment, digital change, or implementation, where people are often carrying different parts of the picture.
Why it matters now
In a period of growing complexity, institutions need more than speed.
They need approaches that support reflection, clarity, and better conversation.
That is one reason I still return to visible thinking. It reminds us that better outcomes often begin with making thinking more explicit - whether that is in feedback, professional learning, or a difficult institutional conversation.
What I take from it into my work
I do not treat visible thinking as a branded method to apply everywhere.
I treat it as a useful reminder:
make assumptions visible
create space for reflection
support better questions
help people think together, not just react
That is valuable in teaching, and it is equally valuable in change.
Discuss your project
If you are thinking about reflection, feedback, staff development, or how to support better dialogue in higher education, I’d be glad to hear more.


Comments